Owl Light
Where Inspiration & Inquiry Converge
  • Home
  • Literary Journal
  • Owl Light Sponsorship
  • Digital Owl
  • Contact Us
  • Login
  • Home
  • Literary Journal
  • Owl Light Sponsorship
  • Digital Owl
  • Contact Us
  • Login
  • Home
  • /
  • Uncategorized

Gun control and the SAFE Act:Part Three: Assault weapons ban and pistol permit renewal

by Len Geller –

Assault Weapons Ban

Because assault weapons are extremely dangerous killing machines, able to release multiple rounds in a matter of seconds and then be reloaded in the blink of an eye, and also because such weapons have been used not only in the Sandy Hook massacre but in numerous other mass shootings, Governor Cuomo and the State Legislature felt a sense of urgency to further restrict the already existing ban on such weapons.  They did this by expanding the legal definition of an assault weapon, thereby including more semi-automatic weapons under the ban.

For readers unfamiliar with the definition of a semi-automatic weapon, it is any rifle, shotgun or pistol that has a detachable magazine and fires one bullet or round with each pull of the trigger.  An automatic weapon, on the other hand, fires a continuous stream of bullets when the trigger is depressed.  Since automatic weapons have been federally banned in the United States since 1934, the assault weapons ban under New York law refers exclusively to semi-automatic weapons which, despite their name, are capable of discharging ten or more rounds (depending on the capacity of the magazine) in a matter of seconds and being reloaded just as quickly with another fully loaded magazine.  Most shooters who have used both automatic and semi-automatic weapons actually prefer the latter because they are easier to control and    therefore more accurate in finding the target.

Prior to the SAFE Act, an assault weapon was legally defined as any semi-automatic rifle, pistol or shotgun with a detachable magazine and two or more military-style features, such as a folding or telescoping stock, thumbhole grip, forward hand grips, bayonet mount, flash suppressor or grenade launcher.  The SAFE Act continues the ban but changes the legal definition of an assault weapon to include any semi-automatic rifle, pistol or shotgun with a detachable magazine and just one or more of these military-style features.  This redefinition of an assault weapon had the effect of making thousands of previously legal semi-automatic weapons illegal and their owners subject to legal penalties.  To correct this situation, the SAFE Act included a grandfather clause legalizing prior ownership of such weapons as long as their owners registered them before April 15, 2014.

In 2015 controversy erupted over citizen compliance with the retroactive assault weapons registration.  When the deadline was up, over 44,000 assault weapons had been registered in the state.  This prompted the president of the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association (the state chapter of the NRA) to claim that since there was anywhere between 2 and 4 million assault weapons in New York, this low registration number was evidence of massive non-compliance with the SAFE Act.   Regardless of the SAFE Act’s fate in the courts, he argued, the citizens of New York have effectively repealed it by refusing to register their guns.  But when asked for hard evidence to back up this claim, he was unable to provide any.  The estimate of 2-4 million assault firearms in the state turned out to be a wild guess based on the supposed sales of the AR-15 assault rifle since the 1960s as well as the estimated number of gun owners in the state.  When opponents demanded evidence of these supposed sales going back 50 years, none was forthcoming, prompting one critic to quip that this was just “more verbiage from the gun lobby.”  Since the State Police have no record of the number of assault weapons in the state, it is virtually impossible to determine this number with any degree of accuracy, and therefore impossible to determine the extent of non-compliance with the registration of assault weapons.

Ban on Large-Capacity Magazines

Accompanying the more restrictive ban on assault weapons was a further provision in the SAFE Act that reduced magazine (any bullet-feeding device) capacity and the loading limit in all legal semi-automatic weapons to seven rounds.  Prior to the SAFE Act, both magazine capacity and loading limit were ten rounds, which meant that it was illegal to own or possess a large-capacity magazine greater than ten rounds and to load more than 10 rounds in that magazine.  The only exception to this law was any large-capacity magazine purchased before September 13, 1994, the date of the first assault weapons ban in New York.  Prior to the enactment of the SAFE Act, it was legal to own or possess a pre-94 large-capacity magazine just as long as it was not loaded with more than 10 rounds.  The SAFE Act removes this pre-94 exemption by making it illegal to own or possess a pre-94 large-capacity magazine acquired before January 15, 2013, but reduces the penalty for doing so from a felony to a misdemeanor and allows anyone unaware of the new law not to be charged with an offense as long as they legally dispose of it or permanently modify its capacity to ten rounds within thirty days of being notified of its illegality by law enforcement or a county official.  On the other hand, any person who purchases or obtains a pre-94 large-capacity magazine after this effective date will be charged with a felony.

As critics were quick to point out, and as Governor Cuomo conceded shortly after the SAFE Act’s enactment, most gun manufacturers do not produce seven-round magazines, and even if they did, they wouldn’t fit most semi-automatic weapons, so this provision of the SAFE Act had to be rolled back to allow ten-round magazines.   Despite this glitch, the SAFE Act did not change the seven-round loading limit, except at officially recognized firing ranges and competitions where a ten-round load was permissible.  Later in December 2013 in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Cuomo, the federal district court in Buffalo struck down this provision of the SAFE Act, effectively restoring the ten-round limit.  So the net effect with regard to magazine capacity and loading limits was zero.  Both returned to the pre-SAFE Act standard of ten rounds, where they remain today.

The reaction to the expanded assault weapons ban and the magazine and loading provisions of the SAFE Act was swift and predictable.  Supporters of the SAFE Act heralded the changes as important, long overdue, and making New Yorkers much safer, but opponents denounced the changes as ineffective in controlling gun crime, putting citizens at a distinct disadvantage when confronting criminals, and placing an undue burden on gun owners, thus violating their Second Amendment rights.  In response to these provisions, a coalition of gun-rights supporters led by the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association challenged the constitutionality of the SAFE Act in court.  In New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Cuomo (2013), the same case mentioned earlier, the federal district court in Buffalo upheld the constitutionality of the assault weapons ban and prohibition on large capacity magazines, arguing that they further the state’s overriding interest in keeping its citizens safe, do not disarm citizens (the purchase and possession of semi-automatic weapons are still legal in New York), and therefore do not violate the Second Amendment.  On appeal, this ruling was upheld and confirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit in 2015.  I will return to these Second Amendment issues in the conclusion.

Renewal of Pistol Permits

One final provision of the SAFE Act that affects thousands of New Yorkers is the new requirement that pistol permits must be renewed or recertified every five years.  Previously, they didn’t have to be renewed at all.  If a citizen had a pistol permit before the enactment of the SAFE Act, he or she must renew it by January 15, 2018.  If a permit holder fails to renew within five years, their handgun license will be revoked, and all firearms in their possession, including rifles or shotguns, must be surrendered to a law enforcement agency.  By law, all state records and databases relating to the SAFE Act, including pistol permit renewal records, are exempt from public disclosure.  In addition, the SAFE Act allows permit holders to file an “Opt Out” form that extends this public disclosure exemption to county permit records as well.  Needless to say, thousands of New York pistol permit holders have chosen this option.

Like the more restrictive ban on assault weapons, this provision has come under heavy fire from gun owners and gun rights supporters.   According to critics, this requirement does nothing but make it more difficult for law-abiding gun owners to exercise their Second Amendment rights.   If a pistol permit holder has become ineligible to retain their permit and  guns because of a felony conviction, order of protection, possession of an illegal weapon, or a mental health report, this will be adjudicated through a legal process unrelated to the permit renewal process.  So why do we need it?  This is a good question.  One answer, according to supporters of the new requirement, is to make sure that an ineligible permit holder has not fallen through the cracks, and if they have, to fix the mechanism responsible.  Another reason is to clean up the county databases that probably have hundreds if not thousands of names of permit holders who have moved out of the county and/or out of the state, are deceased, or simply no longer own any handguns.  As for the charge that this will make it more difficult for law-abiding gun owners to exercise their Second Amendment rights, supporters of this provision argue that the renewal process in fact couldn’t be easier.  All a permit holder has to do is go online to the SAFE Act website, follow the prompts and fill in the information.  It takes a whole five minutes and is free of charge.

Conclusion

The major issue facing New Yorkers in the gun-control debate is the same issue that faces the country in the debate over terrorism: how to balance individual liberty and personal privacy with concerns for public safety and security.  There is no easy answer to this question.  In the landmark Supreme Court decision of District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) in which the Court defined the Second Amendment as an individual or personal right to self-defense and self-protection unrelated to a citizen’s militia service, the Court also made it clear that this right is not   absolute or unlimited, but one that may be restricted by concerns for public safety and security.  In other words, the Court staked out a middle ground between the untenable extremes of absolutely prohibiting firearms and imposing no or very few restrictions on their ownership, possession and use.  The SAFE Act does the same thing.  On the one hand, it recognizes the right to bear arms and does not constitutionally infringe on that right, although it may have gone too far in restricting the rights of mental health patients. It preserves the right to own and possess semi-automatic weapons for self-defense, hunting, and other recreational purposes, while leaving in tact the right to own a handgun for self-protection.  It also allows New Yorkers to keep any assault weapons purchased before the enactment of the SAFE Act, provided they were registered within one year of its enactment.  On the other hand, it establishes limitations on the Second Amendment by redefining and outlawing assault weapons, banning large-capacity magazines, making it as difficult as possible for the most dangerous elements of society to gain access to guns legally, and imposing harsher penalties for gun crimes.  While citizens will continue to disagree on where to draw the line between liberty and public safety, it is essential to strike a reasonable balance between them.   What form this compromise will take can only be decided politically, and that debate will not and should not end.

Posted on August 11, 2017 by owllightnews.com. This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Nature Reflections: Milkweeds and Monarchs
The Light Lens: My personal Robot Overlord

    Recent Posts

    • Visual Studies Workshop Announces Project Space Residency Open Application Period
    • West End Gallery showcasing Brian S. Keeler, Treacy Ziegler
    • Hard
    • Eye-Magine – Future Youth Art Exhibit
    • “These Wilds” Announcement

    Recent Comments

    • Darlene on Let’s Talk About Beep!
    • Darlene Bentley on Hello! from a new Guest Editor, and Finding Joy in Hardship.
    • owllightnews.com on The Farm
    • Douglas Morgan on The Farm
    • owllightnews.com on Energizing and Engaging Fun at GEVA

    Archives

    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017

    Categories

    • #2021
    • Agriculture
    • Animals
    • Antiques
    • Art
    • Astronomy
    • automobiles
    • Beekeeping
    • Birthday
    • Boating
    • books
    • Botany
    • Broome County
    • Buffalo
    • Canadice
    • Canandaigua
    • Cartoon
    • Children
    • Civics
    • Collecting
    • Comic Strip
    • Community Information
    • concert
    • Covid-19
    • Creative non-fiction
    • Dansville
    • Death
    • Democracy
    • Dogs
    • Editorial
    • Education
    • Environmental
    • Essay
    • Family Fun
    • Fantasy
    • Fiction
    • film
    • Finger Lakes
    • Food and Beverage
    • gallery
    • Gardening
    • Gender Rights
    • Great Lakes
    • Health
    • History
    • Holiday
    • Honeoye
    • Human Interest
    • Human Rights
    • In Memoriam
    • Innovation
    • Interview
    • Leisurely Pursuits
    • Literary Arts
    • Little Lakes
    • Live Theatre
    • Livingston County
    • media
    • Monroe County
    • Movies
    • Museums
    • Music
    • Naples, NY
    • Nature
    • Night Sky
    • No. 1
    • NYS
    • Obituary
    • online
    • Ontario County
    • Opinion
    • Outdoor Sports
    • OWL Light
    • Owl Light News
    • Owl Light Newsstand locations
    • Owl Light Sponsor
    • Owl Sponsor
    • OwlLight Blogpost
    • OwlLightNewsArchive
    • Performing Arts
    • Photography
    • Poetry
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Recipe
    • Reviews
    • Richmond, NY
    • Rochester
    • Satire
    • Science
    • Scifi
    • Seniors
    • Shop Local
    • Social Justice
    • sports
    • STEM
    • Steuben County
    • Sustainability
    • Theatre
    • Tioga County
    • Tompkins County
    • Travel
    • Uncategorized
    • Veterans
    • Weather
    • Women's Rights
    • Wood working
    • writing
    • Wyoming County
    • Yates County
    • Young Adult
    • youth
    • Zoom

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
Powered by